source · primary doc
The General-Purpose AI Code of Practice
src_eu_gpai_code_of_practice
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/contents-code-gpai
authors: European Commission
published: 2025-07-10
accessed: 2026-04-19
Notes
Official EU Commission page publishing the voluntary GPAI Code of Practice and listing signatories; primary_doc prior 0.90, bumped slightly as this is the canonical source for the artifact and signatory list.
Intake provenance
- method
- httpx
- tool
- afls-ingest/0.0.1
- git sha
- 4d098737f648
- at
- 2026-04-19T20:26:54.961375Z
- sha256
- 232ab010c0d2…
Evidence from this source (5)
- weight0.95
method: primary_testimony · locator: Introductory paragraphs
“The code was published on July 10, 2025... The Commission and the AI Board have confirmed that the code is an adequate voluntary tool for providers of GPAI models to demonstrate compliance with the AI Act.”
- weight0.95
method: primary_testimony · locator: Section: Signatories of the code of practice
“Aleph Alpha... Amazon, Anthropic, Black Forest Labs... Cohere... Google... IBM... Microsoft, Mistral AI... OpenAI...”
- weight0.95
method: primary_testimony · locator: Section: The 3 chapters of the code
“The Chapters on Transparency and Copyright offer all providers of general-purpose AI models a way to demonstrate compliance with their obligations under Article 53 AI Act. The Chapters on Safety and Security is only relevant to the small number of providers of the most advanced models... under Article 55 AI Act.”
- weight0.90
method: primary_testimony · locator: Introductory paragraphs
“Signatories of the Code have established the Signatory Taskforce, chaired by the AI Office, to facilitate a coherent application of the Code. The Vademecum contains the rules of procedure and the list of members.”
- weight0.95
method: primary_testimony · locator: Section: Signatories of the code of practice, final paragraph
“xAI signed up to the Safety and Security Chapter; this means that it will have to demonstrate compliance with the AI Act's obligations concerning transparency and copyright via alternative adequate means.”