ai-for-less-suffering.com

← all sources

source · primary doc

Anthropic's Responsible Scaling Policy: Version 3.0

src_anthropic_rsp_v3

https://www.anthropic.com/news/responsible-scaling-policy-v3

reliability
0.88

authors: Anthropic

published: 2026-02-24

accessed: 2026-04-19

Notes

First-party policy announcement. Slight discount from primary_doc prior (0.90) because the document is self-assessing Anthropic's own theory of change.

Intake provenance

method
httpx
tool
afls-ingest/0.0.1
git sha
604c9dfd252a
at
2026-04-19T18:45:29.039437Z
sha256
6094336a209d…

Evidence from this source (5)

  • weight
    0.95

    method: primary_testimony · locator: Section: Updating our Responsible Scaling Policy, item 2

    “Our new RSP introduces a requirement to develop and publish a Frontier Safety Roadmap, which will describe our concrete plans for risk mitigations across the areas of Security, Alignment, Safeguards, and Policy.”
  • weight
    0.90

    method: primary_testimony · locator: Section: Updating our Responsible Scaling Policy, item 3

    “Risk Reports will be published online (with some redactions) every 3-6 months... They will have unredacted or minimally-redacted access to the Risk Report and will subject our reasoning, analysis, and decision-making to a comprehensive public review.”
  • weight
    0.90

    method: primary_testimony · locator: Section: Assessing our theory of change

    “We found pre-set capability levels to be far more ambiguous than we anticipated... The science of model evaluation isn't well-developed enough to provide dispositive answers.”
  • weight
    0.75

    method: journalistic_report · locator: Section: Assessing our theory of change

    “The policy environment has shifted toward prioritizing AI competitiveness and economic growth, while safety-oriented discussions have yet to gain meaningful traction at the federal level.”
  • weight
    0.95

    method: primary_testimony · locator: Section: Updating our Responsible Scaling Policy, item 1

    “Our RSP now outlines two sets of mitigations: first, the mitigations that we plan to pursue regardless of what others do; and second, an ambitious capabilities-to-mitigations map that, we believe, would help adequately manage the risks from advanced AI if implemented across the AI industry.”