✍️ Content creators
camp_content_creators
Training on authored work without consent is the violation, independent of what the model outputs. Active live blocker via copyright litigation; previously absent from the graph. Cross-cuts camp_displaced_workers (shares the harm layer) but grounds the claim in authorship rights rather than labor dignity.
Agents
- · The New York Times Company (plaintiff, NYT v. OpenAI/Microsoft)
- · Authors Guild (plaintiff class, Authors Guild v. OpenAI)
- · Getty Images (plaintiff, Getty v. Stability AI)
- · RIAA and major music labels
- · SAG-AFTRA on AI-replacement contract clauses
- · Individual authors and artists pursuing training-data suits
Descriptive claims held (12)
- AI capability is accelerating along compute, data, and algorithmic axes.
- Major model developers including OpenAI and Google have signed paid data-licens…
- Linguist Emily M. Bender and sociologist Alex Hanna argue that 'AI hype' functi…
- Empirical studies have measured a ~12% decline in Stack Overflow traffic follow…
- Frontier AI performance scales with compute and capex.
- In a controlled study, professional software developers granted access to GitHu…
- Repeated exposure to the same datapoint during training causes generative model…
- Amortized hardware and energy cost of flagship training runs has grown ~2.4x an…
- Under the assumption that a generative model's output entropy is at most the tr…
- Post-training via reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) systematica…
- Training compute for frontier AI models has grown roughly 4-5x per year from 20…
- Frontier-lab and big-tech employees have episodically resisted DoD contracts (G…